In re Williams

242 F. App'x 887
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedSeptember 27, 2007
DocketNo. 07-3103
StatusPublished

This text of 242 F. App'x 887 (In re Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Williams, 242 F. App'x 887 (3d Cir. 2007).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

It appears that Dwight Williams was arrested in September 2005, and since that time has been detained while awaiting trial on drug charges. Williams claims that on May 15, 2007, he filed a pro se motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3162, seeking to challenge the legality of his incarceration. Williams seeks a writ of mandamus directing the District Court to rule on the motion. Importantly, however, the District Court docket contains no entry of a pro se filing by Williams in May 2007. We cannot, of course, direct adjudication of a motion which has not been filed. Accordingly, we will deny the mandamus petition.1 [888]*888seeks information about court-appointed representation in his criminal proceedings, his inquiries should be directed to the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanctions
18 U.S.C. § 3162

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 F. App'x 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-williams-ca3-2007.