In re Williams-Bensaadat
This text of 964 So. 2d 317 (In re Williams-Bensaadat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent failed to competently represent her clients, neglected legal matters, failed to communicate with her clients, engaged in conduct constituting a conflict of interest, and allowed her clients’ cases to prescribe. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent admits that her conduct violated Rules 1.1(a), 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.9, and 1.16(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition for consent discipline,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Satrica Williams-Bensaadat, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26142, be publicly reprimanded.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall be placed on probation for a period of two years, subject to the conditions set forth in the joint petition for consent discipline.
[318]*318IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
964 So. 2d 317, 2007 La. LEXIS 1869, 2007 WL 2683793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-williams-bensaadat-la-2007.