In re Williams

989 S.W.2d 922, 337 Ark. 541, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 266
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 20, 1999
Docket99-426
StatusPublished

This text of 989 S.W.2d 922 (In re Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Williams, 989 S.W.2d 922, 337 Ark. 541, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 266 (Ark. 1999).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct filed an original action in this court asking that the respondent, Mr. Timothy D. Williams, appear before this court to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with the procedures of this court in the regulation of professional conduct of attorneys at law. Williams’s alleged violations of supreme court procedures have been set out in the Committee’s petition and amended petition, which are attached to this order. Those alleged violations include (1) continuing the practice of law during a period of suspension, (2) fading to notify opposing counsel of record that the attorney had been suspended, (3) fading to file a copy of the notice of suspension with the court with pending cases of the suspended attorney, (4) fading to file a list of jurisdictions to which suspended attorney is admitted to practice, and (5) failing to file an affidavit of compliance with section 7 of the procedures for filing an affidavit explaining the attorney’s noncompliance.

Pursuant to the Professional Conduct Committee’s petition, as amended, we order Mr. Williams to appear before this court at 9:00 a.m. on June 24, 1999, to consider the relief requested in the Committee’s petition, including why Mr. Williams should not be held in contempt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
989 S.W.2d 922, 337 Ark. 541, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-williams-ark-1999.