In re Williams

592 S.W.2d 438, 265 Ark. 480, 1979 Ark. LEXIS 1374
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 9, 1979
Docket79-145
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 592 S.W.2d 438 (In re Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Williams, 592 S.W.2d 438, 265 Ark. 480, 1979 Ark. LEXIS 1374 (Ark. 1979).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

It appears to the court that:

This court accepted the surrender of the license of Wayne R. Williams to practice law in the State of Arkansas upon his petition and the recommendation of the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, upon conditions set out in a per curiam order entered July 19, 1976, viz:

Accordingly, we deem it appropriate to accept surrender of petitioner’s license for a two-year period, but this does not mean petitioner will be automatically reinstated at the end of this period. Petitioner will only be readmitted upon a satisfactory showing to the Board of Law Examiners that his character and integrity are such that he deserves readmittance. Another condition of the suspension is that petitioner refrain from assisting any other attorney engaged in the practice of law and from accepting employment by any other attorney in any capacity whatever during the term of his suspension. The burden of proof shall rest upon petitioner in making those showings to the Board of Law Examiners.

The State Board of Law Examiners has certified that it has conducted a hearing as a result of which it found:

(a) that Wayne R. Williams has satisfactorily shown that his character and integrity are such that he deserves readmission; and,
(b) that Wayne R. Williams has refrained from assisting any attorney engaged in the practice of law and has not accepted employment from any attorney in any capacity during the term of his suspension.

It is therefore ordered that Wayne R. Williams be readmitted to the practice of law and that his license to do so be reissued.

Harris, C.J., and Byrd and Hickman, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Neal
16 S.W.3d 228 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
592 S.W.2d 438, 265 Ark. 480, 1979 Ark. LEXIS 1374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-williams-ark-1979.