in Re William T. Booth, Kay Booth, John v. Booth and the W v. Booth Limited Partnership
This text of in Re William T. Booth, Kay Booth, John v. Booth and the W v. Booth Limited Partnership (in Re William T. Booth, Kay Booth, John v. Booth and the W v. Booth Limited Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-05-00309-CV
IN RE William T. BOOTH, Kay Booth, John V. Booth,
and the W.V. Booth Family Limited Partnership
Original Mandamus Proceeding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 25, 2005
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay. The court is of the opinion that relief should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay are denied. Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re William T. Booth, Kay Booth, John v. Booth and the W v. Booth Limited Partnership, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-t-booth-kay-booth-john-v-booth-and-t-texapp-2005.