Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/in Re William T. Booth, Kay Booth, John v. Booth and the W v. Booth Limited Partnership

in Re William T. Booth, Kay Booth, John v. Booth and the W v. Booth Limited Partnership

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 25, 2005·No. 04-05-00309-CV·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION



No. 04-05-00309-CV


IN RE William T. BOOTH, Kay Booth, John V. Booth,

and the W.V. Booth Family Limited Partnership


Original Mandamus Proceeding


PER CURIAM

Sitting:            Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed:   May 25, 2005


PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

            The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay. The court is of the opinion that relief should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay are denied. Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re William T. Booth, Kay Booth, John v. Booth and the W v. Booth Limited Partnership, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

in Re William T. Booth, Kay Booth, John v. Booth and the W v. Booth Limited Partnership (in Re William T. Booth, Kay Booth, John v. Booth and the W v. Booth Limited Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.