in Re William Sullivan

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00295-CV

IN RE WILLIAM SULLIVAN RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of

the opinion that relief should be denied.2 Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d). 2 The relator complains that the respondent has failed to hold a hearing on his pro se application for writ of habeas corpus bond reduction, but the trial court clerk has indicated that relator is still represented by appointed counsel and that there is no motion to withdraw on file. See Ex parte Bohannan, 350 S.W.3d 116, 116 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (noting that when an applicant is represented by counsel, he is not entitled to hybrid representation, and the court can disregard his pro se submissions and take no action on them). DELIVERED: July 25, 2012