In re William S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re William S.

231 A.D.2d 950, 648 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10924

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 1996·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously af[951] firmed without costs. Memorandum: The evidence is sufficient to support Family Court’s determination that respondents violated the terms of the order of protection by inflicting excessive corporal punishment on their son Lucas (see, Family Ct Act § 1072). The conflicting testimony at the hearing presented an issue of credibility for the court to resolve, and we find no reason to disturb the court’s determination (see, Matter of Carine T., 183 AD2d 902, 902-903, lv denied 80 NY2d 757). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Paris, J.— Order of Protection.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously af[951] firmed without costs. Memorandum: The evidence is sufficient to support Family Court’s determination that respondents violated the terms of the order of protection by inflicting excessive corporal punishment on their son Lucas (see, Family Ct Act § 1072). The conflicting testimony at the hearing presented an issue of credibility for the court to resolve, and we find no reason to disturb the court’s determination (see, Matter of Carine T., 183 AD2d 902, 902-903, lv denied 80 NY2d 757). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Paris, J.— Order of Protection.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

In re William S., 231 A.D.2d 950, 648 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

231 A.D.2d 950 (In re William S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related