In re William S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re William S.

231 A.D.2d 950, 648 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10924

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 231 A.D.2d 950 (In re William S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re William S., 231 A.D.2d 950, 648 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously af[951]*951firmed without costs. Memorandum: The evidence is sufficient to support Family Court’s determination that respondents violated the terms of the order of protection by inflicting excessive corporal punishment on their son Lucas (see, Family Ct Act § 1072). The conflicting testimony at the hearing presented an issue of credibility for the court to resolve, and we find no reason to disturb the court’s determination (see, Matter of Carine T., 183 AD2d 902, 902-903, lv denied 80 NY2d 757). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Paris, J.— Order of Protection.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously af[951]*951firmed without costs. Memorandum: The evidence is sufficient to support Family Court’s determination that respondents violated the terms of the order of protection by inflicting excessive corporal punishment on their son Lucas (see, Family Ct Act § 1072). The conflicting testimony at the hearing presented an issue of credibility for the court to resolve, and we find no reason to disturb the court’s determination (see, Matter of Carine T., 183 AD2d 902, 902-903, lv denied 80 NY2d 757). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Paris, J.— Order of Protection.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D.2d 950, 648 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-s-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack