in Re: William N. Woolsey, Individually and Woolsey & Schmidt, L.L.P.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: March 21, 2006
• Docket: 13-05-00724-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-05-724-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_________________________________________________________________

         IN RE:  WILLIAM N. WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY, AND

WOOLSEY & SCHMIDT, L.L.P.  

__________________________________________________________________

                      On Petition for Writ of Mandamus __________________________________________________________________

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

                            Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion^[1]

Relators, William N. Woolsey, Individually, and Woolsey & Schmidt, L.L.P., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on November 16, 2005.  Real Party in Interest, Jack L. Stone, filed a response on December 13, 2005.  The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought.  Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 21st day of March, 2006.    

---

^[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).