In Re: William Michael Talley v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: William Michael Talley v. the State of Texas (In Re: William Michael Talley v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-24-00071-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
IN RE: §
WILLIAM MICHAEL TALLEY, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
RELATOR §
MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM William Michael Talley, acting pro se, filed this original proceeding to challenge Respondent’s failure to rule on his motions for discovery control plan, change of venue, and recusal. 1 Relator filed a notice of withdrawal, in which he asks this Court to take no further action in this proceeding. We construe this notice as a motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).
Opinion delivered May 31, 2024. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
1 Respondent is the Honorable Jerald (Dean) Fowler, II, Judge of the 115th District Court in Upshur County, Texas. Kenneth Ray Woolf, Michael Blake Talley, and Tracy Elizabeth Talley are the Real Parties in Interest. COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT
MAY 31, 2024
NO. 12-24-00071-CV
WILLIAM MICHAEL TALLEY, Relator V.
HON. JERALD (DEAN) FOWLER II, Respondent
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ON THIS DAY came to be heard the motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus filed by William Michael Talley; who is the relator in appellate cause number 12-24- 00071-CV and a party to trial court cause number 506-23, pending on the docket of the 115th Judicial District Court of Upshur County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on April 1, 2024, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby granted and this proceeding is dismissed. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: William Michael Talley v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-michael-talley-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.