in Re: William Long, Sr.
This text of in Re: William Long, Sr. (in Re: William Long, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-06-361-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE: WILLIAM LONG, SR.
On appeal from the130th District Court
of Matagorda County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Castillo and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam[1]
Relator, William Long, Sr. filed a motion for temporary relief and a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on June 26, 2006. The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for temporary relief and petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for temporary relief are DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 26th day of June, 2006.
[1] See Tex. R. App. P.47.1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: William Long, Sr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-long-sr-texapp-2006.