in Re: William Lisle and Smith Lisle Holdings, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 12, 2022·No. 05-22-00822-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed October 12, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00822-CV

IN RE WILLIAM LISLE AND SMITH LISLE HOLDINGS, LTD., Relators

Original Proceeding from the 416th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416-00639-2015

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Nowell Relators ask the trial court for a writ of mandamus to vacate an order enforcing

a permanent injunction and an order denying approval of relators’ proposed solution

to a drainage problem. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that

the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate remedy by

appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding).

After reviewing the petition, the response, the reply, and the record before us,

we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

/Erin A. Nowell/ 220822f.p05 ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI