In re William John S.
This text of 601 A.2d 1112 (In re William John S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The primary question presented is whether the trial court erred in dismissing a juvenile delinquency petition for failure of the State to comply with the time requirements of Maryland Code (1984, 1991 Cum.Supp.), § 3-810 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article. For the reasons stated in this Court’s opinion in In re: Keith G., 325 Md. 538, 601 A.2d 1107 (1992) [No. 60, September Term, 1991, decided February 26, 1992], the sanction of dismissal of the juvenile petition was not appropriate; and we, therefore, shall reverse the judgment and remand the case for further proceedings.
JUDGMENT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR HAR-FORD COUNTY REVERSED; CASE REMANDED TO THAT COURT WITH DIRECTIONS TO REINSTATE THE [550]*550JUVENILE DELINQUENCY PETITION AND TO CONDUCT FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH IN RE: KEITH G., 325 Md. 538, 601 A.2d 1107 (1992) [No. 60, September Term, 1991, decided February 26, 1992]. COSTS TO BE PAID BY WILLIAM JOHN S.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
601 A.2d 1112, 325 Md. 549, 1992 Md. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-john-s-md-1992.