in Re: William J. Tinning
This text of in Re: William J. Tinning (in Re: William J. Tinning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-04-00659-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_______________________________________________________
IN RE WILLIAM J. TINNING
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus _______________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Garza, and Wittig
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Relator, William J. Tinning, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on December 10, 2004. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 25th day of January, 2005.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: William J. Tinning, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-j-tinning-texapp-2005.