In Re William Henry Krieg v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re William Henry Krieg v. the State of Texas (In Re William Henry Krieg v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-26-00425-CV
In re William Henry Krieg
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Krieg, who is acting pro se and an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice, seeks mandamus relief to require the district court to issue findings of fact and
conclusions of law concerning an order of dismissal that he represents the trial court signed on
December 30, 2025.
Even if mandamus relief is available to correct a trial court’s failure to issue
findings of fact and conclusions of law, relator has not established his entitlement to mandamus
relief. Based on the record provided, the trial court was not required to issue findings of fact and
conclusions of law because relator did not request them timely. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 296
(requiring party to file request for findings of fact and conclusions of law within 20 days after
judgment is signed), 297 (requiring court to file findings of fact and conclusions of law “after a
timely request is filed”). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R.
App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis
Filed: May 19, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re William Henry Krieg v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-henry-krieg-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp3-2026.