in Re William Harris
This text of in Re William Harris (in Re William Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 12, 2010
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-10-00359-CR
———————————
IN RE WILLIAM HARRIS, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, William Harris, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. Relator asks this Court to order the trial court judge[1] to withdraw her January 29, 2010 denial of his post-conviction[2] motion for forensic DNA testing under Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.[3] See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01—.05 (Vernon Supp. 2009).
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Bland and Sharp.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
[1] Respondent is the Honorable Mary Lou Keel, Presiding Judge, of the 232nd District Court of Harris County, Texas.
[2] Relator’s appeal of the trial court’s January 10, 2010 order is pending in this Court as appellate number 01-10-00171-CR.
[3] Relator was convicted in trial court cause number 876384 of the offense of murder. He was sentenced to confinement for sixty-five years and assessed a $10,000 fine. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. See Harris v. State, 133 S.W.3d 760 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2004, pet.ref’d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re William Harris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-harris-texapp-2010.