in Re William Edward Jones
This text of in Re William Edward Jones (in Re William Edward Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-18-00478-CV
In re William Edward Jones
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BLANCO COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator William Edward Jones filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court
to compel the respondent district-court judge to rule on a pending motion to dismiss a forfeiture
proceeding for want of prosecution. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.
In response, real party in interest the State of Texas informed the Court that it had reached an
agreement with relator that resolved the underlying civil matter and attached the agreed final
judgment signed by the district court, which it asserted renders the petition for writ of mandamus
moot. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (“A case becomes
moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings . . . .”).
Accordingly, we grant the State’s request and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.
__________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland
Filed: October 19, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re William Edward Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-edward-jones-texapp-2018.