in Re: William David Mick

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 22, 2006
Docket13-06-00456-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: William David Mick (in Re: William David Mick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: William David Mick, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-06-456-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

IN RE: WILLIAM DAVID MICK

__________________________________________________________________



On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
__________________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)



Relator, William David Mick, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on August 18, 2006. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 22nd day of August, 2006.

1.

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: William David Mick, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-david-mick-texapp-2006.