in Re William David Golden

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 3, 2012·No. 01-12-00265-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued May 3, 2012.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-12-00265-CV

———————————

IN RE WILLIAM DAVID GOLDEN, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

          In this original proceeding, relatorWilliam David Goldenseeksmandamus review of the trial court’s order determining that there are no inaccuracies in the reporter’s record.[1]We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.  All pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Huddle.



[1]           The underlying proceeding is Golden v. Golden, No. 2008-67084, 245th District Court, Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Roy Moore, presiding.  In the underlying case, Golden appealed to this court.  That appeal, Golden v. Golden, no. 01-01-00735-CV, is pending.  After Golden asserted that the reporter’s record was inaccurate, this court abated for a hearing under Texas Rule of Appellate procedure 34.6(e)(2).  After notice and a hearing, the trial court determined that the reporter’s record filed in number 01-09-00735-CV is accurate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re William David Golden, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in Re William David Golden (in Re William David Golden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.