In Re William D. Kraemer, Debtor. William D. Kraemer v. Glynn H. Crook, Cynthia M. Crook
Opinion
In re William D. KRAEMER, Debtor.
William D. KRAEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Glynn H. CROOK, Cynthia M. Crook, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-8839
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
May 24, 1989.
Tash J. Van Dora, Savell & Williams, S. Lester Tate, III, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.
William Eugene Otwell, Austell, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; J. Owen Forrester, Judge.
Before TJOFLAT, FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the district court's judgment for the reasons stated in its dispositive order of October 4, 1988. See Kraemer v. Crook, 94 B.R. 207 (N.D.Ga.1988).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
873 F.2d 1406 (In Re William D. Kraemer, Debtor. William D. Kraemer v. Glynn H. Crook, Cynthia M. Crook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.