In Re William D. Kraemer, Debtor. William D. Kraemer v. Glynn H. Crook, Cynthia M. Crook
This text of 873 F.2d 1406 (In Re William D. Kraemer, Debtor. William D. Kraemer v. Glynn H. Crook, Cynthia M. Crook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re William D. KRAEMER, Debtor.
William D. KRAEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Glynn H. CROOK, Cynthia M. Crook, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-8839
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
May 24, 1989.
Tash J. Van Dora, Savell & Williams, S. Lester Tate, III, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.
William Eugene Otwell, Austell, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; J. Owen Forrester, Judge.
Before TJOFLAT, FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the district court's judgment for the reasons stated in its dispositive order of October 4, 1988. See Kraemer v. Crook, 94 B.R. 207 (N.D.Ga.1988).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
873 F.2d 1406, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-d-kraemer-debtor-william-d-kraemer-v-glynn-h-crook-ca11-1989.