In Re William D.

912 A.2d 479, 280 Conn. 943, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 472
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 29, 2006
DocketSC 17783
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 912 A.2d 479 (In Re William D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re William D., 912 A.2d 479, 280 Conn. 943, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 472 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 97 Conn. App. 600 (AC 26688), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the term ‘child’ as used in General Statutes § 46b-141 (b) did not have the meaning defined under General Statutes § 46b-120 (1), but rather referred to a person who was previously committed as a delinquent under the provisions of § 46b-141 (a)?”

*944 Decided November 29, 2006 Maura Murphy-Osbome, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re William D.
933 A.2d 1147 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
912 A.2d 479, 280 Conn. 943, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-d-conn-2006.