In Re William D.

912 A.2d 479, 280 Conn. 943, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 472
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 29, 2006·No. SC 17783·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 97 Conn. App. 600 (AC 26688), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the term ‘child’ as used in General Statutes § 46b-141 (b) did not have the meaning defined under General Statutes § 46b-120 (1), but rather referred to a person who was previously committed as a delinquent under the provisions of § 46b-141 (a)?”

*944 Decided November 29, 2006 Maura Murphy-Osbome, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re William D., 912 A.2d 479, 280 Conn. 943, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 472 (Colo. 2006).

912 A.2d 479 (In Re William D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re William D.
933 A.2d 1147 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)