In Re William Curtis Jones v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-24-00297-CR __________________
IN RE WILLIAM CURTIS JONES
__________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding 252nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 15-23712 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In a petition for a writ of mandamus, William Curtis Jones asks this Court to
“modify the Trial, and Appellate Court Records to uphold a fair and impartial
portrayal of the case, reassess its unconstitutional treatment of the Relator’s Writs,
Petitions, or Motions, overturn the judgment, or remand the case to the Trial Court.”
As alternative relief, Jones asks the Court of Appeals to instruct the trial court to
“present the ‘Criminal Complaint Affidavit’ or ‘Probable Cause Affidavit,’
explicitly indicating that the ‘accused-defendant’ and the accuser-complainant
owner’ are not the same individuals as the Relator.” Additionally, Jones asks this
1 Court “to compel the 252nd Judicial District Court to make rulings on all pending
motions[]” and issue an order “finding the dismissal of the fraudulent Criminal
Complaint Affidavit will ultimately lead to the dismissal of the fatally flawed
Indictments, thus advancing the order to set aside the judgment of conviction[.]”
“[I]n order for mandamus to issue, the party seeking mandamus must show
that there is no other adequate remedy available and that the act sought to be
compelled is a ministerial act.” State ex rel. Holmes v. Klevenhagen, 819 S.W.2d
539, 541 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition,
issues, and arguments, we conclude that Jones has failed to establish that he is
entitled to the relief sought in his petition. Accordingly, we deny the petition for a
writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on September 24, 2024 Opinion Delivered September 25, 2024 Do Not Publish
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Chambers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re William Curtis Jones v. the State of Texas (In Re William Curtis Jones v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.