In Re William Cobb, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)
Opinion
ENTRY ORDER
2022 VT 55
SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 22-AP-145
OCTOBER TERM, 2022
In re William Cobb, Esq. } Original Jurisdiction (Office of Disciplinary Counsel) } } Professional Responsibility Board } } Case Nos. PRB-099-2020, PRB-103-2020
In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:
¶ 1. When the mandate issues in this case under Vermont Rule of Appellate Procedure 41 and this Court’s October 13, 2022 decision suspending respondent from the practice of law for fifteen months becomes final, respondent will also be suspended for the remainder of his term in office as a probate judge, without compensation. See Rule 6(24) of the Rules Governing the Disciplinary Control of Judges (“A judge suspended by the Supreme Court from the practice of law shall be suspended for the remainder of the judge’s term in office, without compensation.”). Absent a motion for reargument, the mandate will issue on November 3, 2022.
BY THE COURT:
Paul L. Reiber, Chief Justice
Harold E. Eaton, Jr., Associate Justice
Karen R. Carroll, Associate Justice
William D. Cohen, Associate Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2022 VT 55 (In Re William Cobb, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.