in Re William Charles Webb
This text of in Re William Charles Webb (in Re William Charles Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-22-00040-CR
IN RE WILLIAM CHARLES WEBB
From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-675-C2
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus filed on February 11, 2022, is denied.1
STEVE SMITH Justice
1 Webb has already been appointed counsel to pursue a Chapter 64 motion for DNA testing and, therefore, is not entitled to a ruling on his pro se Chapter 64 motion. To compel such a ruling would be in derogation of the prohibition on hybrid representation. Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Smith, and Justice Wright2 Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed February 23, 2022 Do not publish [OT06]
2 The Honorable Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired) of the Eleventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.
In re Webb Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re William Charles Webb, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-charles-webb-texapp-2022.