In re William B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re William B.

215 A.D.2d 377, 626 N.Y.S.2d 213, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4693

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 215 A.D.2d 377 (In re William B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re William B., 215 A.D.2d 377, 626 N.Y.S.2d 213, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered March 31, 1994, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, entered February 15, 1994, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 165.45 [4]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 265.01 [1]), adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent, and placed him on probation for a period of one year. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order entered February 15, 1994.

Ordered that the order of disposition is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the fact-finding order is vacated, the petition is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Westchester County, for the purpose of entering an order pursuant to Family Court Act § 375.1.

The petition is jurisdictionally defective because it contains neither a ballistics report, nor other non-hearsay allegations sufficient to make out a prima facie case that the weapon was operable at the time the respondent possessed it (see, Matter of Rodney J., 83 NY2d 503; Matter of Alex A., 189 AD2d 596). [378]*378Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered March 31, 1994, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, entered February 15, 1994, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 165.45 [4]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 265.01 [1]), adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent, and placed him on probation for a period of one year. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order entered February 15, 1994.

Ordered that the order of disposition is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the fact-finding order is vacated, the petition is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Westchester County, for the purpose of entering an order pursuant to Family Court Act § 375.1.

The petition is jurisdictionally defective because it contains neither a ballistics report, nor other non-hearsay allegations sufficient to make out a prima facie case that the weapon was operable at the time the respondent possessed it (see, Matter of Rodney J., 83 NY2d 503; Matter of Alex A., 189 AD2d 596). [378]*378Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 377, 626 N.Y.S.2d 213, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-b-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack