In Re: William A. MacGuire
This text of 60 F.3d 823 (In Re: William A. MacGuire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 F.3d 823
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In Re: William A. MacGUIRE, Petitioner.
No. 95-8020.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 29, 1995.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of prohibition in this court to confine the district court's exercise of jurisdiction. Mandamus and prohibition are drastic remedies to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Petitioner's request is baseless and without merit. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
We deny petitioner's motion to expedite because the motion is now moot
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 823, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24855, 1995 WL 384428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-a-macguire-ca4-1995.