in Re: William A. Boothe, M.D. and Wendy J. Boothe

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re: William A. Boothe, M.D. and Wendy J. Boothe

395 S.W.3d 393, 2013 WL 765148, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 1787

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 22, 2013·No. 05-13-00198-CV·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice LEWIS.

Relators contend the trial judge erred in dissolving a writ of garnishment. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them here *394 in. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY rela-tors’ petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion to stay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice LEWIS.

Relators contend the trial judge erred in dissolving a writ of garnishment. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them here *394 in. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY rela-tors’ petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion to stay.

in Re: William A. Boothe, M.D. and Wendy J. Boothe, 395 S.W.3d 393, 2013 WL 765148, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 1787 (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

395 S.W.3d 393 (in Re: William A. Boothe, M.D. and Wendy J. Boothe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related