In re Willett-Baker Lumber Corp.
31 F. Supp. 130, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1802
Opinion
The petitioner claims a tax for 1938 and 1939, not because one was due and payable, but because the Department had not ascertained that none was due and payable. To agree to that position would be inequitable to other creditors. The referee’s conclusion is sound, and his ruling is affirmed.
Settle order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Willett-Baker Lumber Corp., 31 F. Supp. 130, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1802 (E.D.N.Y. 1939).
31 F. Supp. 130 (In re Willett-Baker Lumber Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Hotel Martin Co.
41 F. Supp. 392 (N.D. New York, 1941)
Secretary of Labor & Industry v. Epp
121 F.2d 846 (Third Circuit, 1941)
In Re Wm. Akers, Jr., Co.
121 F.2d 846 (Third Circuit, 1941)
In Re Raflowitz
37 F. Supp. 202 (D. Connecticut, 1941)