In Re Will of Evans

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In Re Will of Evans

184 S.E. 818, 209 N.C. 828, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 363

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedApril 8, 1936

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 184 S.E. 818 (In Re Will of Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Will of Evans, 184 S.E. 818, 209 N.C. 828, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 363 (N.C. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on authority of Chancey v. Powell, 103 N. C., 159, 9 S. E., 298. “In the statute of limitations, there is an express exception in favor of the rights of those who may be infants, etc., at the time the right accrues, but if, at that time, there is no disability, although the right may, on the next day, pass to an infant, etc., it is not within the proviso, so that it has grown into a legal adage, ‘When the statute begins to run it continues to run.’ ” Mebane v. Patrick, 46 N. C., 23.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on authority of Chancey v. Powell, 103 N. C., 159, 9 S. E., 298. “In the statute of limitations, there is an express exception in favor of the rights of those who may be infants, etc., at the time the right accrues, but if, at that time, there is no disability, although the right may, on the next day, pass to an infant, etc., it is not within the proviso, so that it has grown into a legal adage, ‘When the statute begins to run it continues to run.’ ” Mebane v. Patrick, 46 N. C., 23.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 S.E. 818, 209 N.C. 828, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-will-of-evans-nc-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack