In re will of Corblis

55 A. 1132, 65 N.J. Eq. 768, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 302
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedAugust 25, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 55 A. 1132 (In re will of Corblis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re will of Corblis, 55 A. 1132, 65 N.J. Eq. 768, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 302 (N.J. 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for tire reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Ordinarjr Reed, filed in the prerogative court. See 52 Atl. Rep. 996.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Voori-iees, Green —9. For reversal — Fort, Bogbrt, Yredenburgh, Yroom — 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A. 1132, 65 N.J. Eq. 768, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-will-of-corblis-nj-1903.