In re Will of Barfield

87 S.E.2d 516, 242 N.C. 308, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 504
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 25, 1955·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per CuRiam.

The caveator challenges the authority of the trial court to set aside the verdict on the ground that in a caveat proceeding there are no parties, a nonsuit cannot be taken or directed, the issue must be passed on by the jury, and hence no discretionary power is lodged in the court to set the verdict aside. This Court has held the trial judge does have authority to set aside the verdict in his discretion when the verdict is against the greater weight of the evidence. On the authority of In re Westfeldt, 188 N.C. 702, 125 S.E. 531, and In re Hargrove, 207 N.C. 280, 176 S.E. 752, the order of the Superior Court of Cumberland County is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Will of Barfield, 87 S.E.2d 516, 242 N.C. 308, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 504 (N.C. 1955).

87 S.E.2d 516 (In re Will of Barfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Will of Hodgin
179 S.E.2d 126 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)