In re Wilks

Supreme Court of Kansas

In re Wilks

803 P.2d 1027, 248 Kan. 16

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJanuary 11, 1991

DocketNo. 63,892

StatusPublished

This text of 803 P.2d 1027 (In re Wilks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wilks, 803 P.2d 1027, 248 Kan. 16 (kan 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Now on this 11th day of January, 1991, the court finds that, on October 27, 1989, respondent Norman D. Wilks was disciplined by suspension for one year and directed to pay any applicable costs and to furnish proof of compliance with Supreme Court Rule 218 (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 155). In re Wilks, 245 Kan. 577, 781 P.2d 246 (1989).

Before resuming the practice of law, the respondent shall fulfill the court’s rules regarding registration, Supreme Court Rule 208 (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 143), and continuing legal education, Supreme Court Rule 801 et seq. (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 355).

The court further finds that the disciplinary administrator has verified that respondent has fully complied with the order of discipline entered by this court on October 27, 1989, that respondent should be discharged from any further obligation in this matter, except as set out above, and that this proceeding is closed.

It Is So Ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Now on this 11th day of January, 1991, the court finds that, on October 27, 1989, respondent Norman D. Wilks was disciplined by suspension for one year and directed to pay any applicable costs and to furnish proof of compliance with Supreme Court Rule 218 (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 155). In re Wilks, 245 Kan. 577, 781 P.2d 246 (1989).

Before resuming the practice of law, the respondent shall fulfill the court’s rules regarding registration, Supreme Court Rule 208 (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 143), and continuing legal education, Supreme Court Rule 801 et seq. (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 355).

The court further finds that the disciplinary administrator has verified that respondent has fully complied with the order of discipline entered by this court on October 27, 1989, that respondent should be discharged from any further obligation in this matter, except as set out above, and that this proceeding is closed.

It Is So Ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

803 P.2d 1027, 248 Kan. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wilks-kan-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack