In re Wilkes Barre Yellow Cab Co.

M.D. Pennsylvania

In re Wilkes Barre Yellow Cab Co.

53 F.2d 1024, 1931 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1838

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 27, 1931

DocketNo. 7284

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 53 F.2d 1024 (In re Wilkes Barre Yellow Cab Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wilkes Barre Yellow Cab Co., 53 F.2d 1024, 1931 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1838 (M.D. Pa. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

WATSON, District Judge.

The order of the referee is before this court for review on the certificate of the referee. The record certified by the referee contains no petition for review filed with the referee in accordance with General Order 27 (11USCA § 53). The General Order is mandatory in requiring a petition of the party desiring a review. In the absence of such, a petition, this court has no authority to review an order made by the referee. In re Finkelstein, 3 F.(2d) 1006 (D. C. E. D. Pa.).

The District Court should look solely to the referee’s certified return in disposition of the application for review. In re Pearlman (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 20'.

I have examined the record ns though it were properly before the District Court, and bankrupt’s contentions are without merit.

Now, November 27, 3931, the application for review of the order of the referee is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI