In re Wiles

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Wiles

881 So. 2d 115, 2004 La. LEXIS 2550, 2004 WL 1950283

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 3, 2004·No. No. 2004-B-1562·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected his client’s legal matter. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Stephen Michael Wiles, Louisiana Bar Roll number 17865, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance [116]*116with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected his client’s legal matter. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Stephen Michael Wiles, Louisiana Bar Roll number 17865, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance [116]*116with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

In re Wiles, 881 So. 2d 115, 2004 La. LEXIS 2550, 2004 WL 1950283 (La. 2004).

Pincite

881 So. 2d 115 (In re Wiles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.