In re Wilde's Sons
144 F. 972, 75 C.C.A. 601, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3924
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 1, 1906·No. No. 80·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
Upon the point of practice raised preliminarily to the main argument, we are clearly of the opinion that, when a District Court is reviewing an order or report of a referee in bankruptcy, under the very broad provisions of Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 2 (10), 30 Stat. 546 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3421], it may properly consider any point presented by the record then before it, whether such point was or was not discussed before or by the referee. .
We are further of the opinion that the order of the District Court should be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Wilde's Sons, 144 F. 972, 75 C.C.A. 601, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3924 (2d Cir. 1906).
144 F. 972 (In re Wilde's Sons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Alaska National Bank
669 F.2d 1325 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Rosehedge Corporation v. Millie Sterett
274 F.2d 786 (Ninth Circuit, 1960)
United States v. Frank Luther, Trustee of the Garden Grain & Seed Co., Inc., Frank Luther, Trustee of the Garden Grain & Seed Co., Inc., Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee. In the Matter of Garden Grain and Seed Co., Inc., Bankrupt (Two Cases)
225 F.2d 499 (Tenth Circuit, 1955)
United States v. Luther
225 F.2d 499 (Tenth Circuit, 1955)
Tinney v. Katcher
134 F.2d 833 (Sixth Circuit, 1943)
In re Elmore Cotton Mills
217 F. 810 (S.D. Alabama, 1914)
In re Quaker Drug Co.
204 F. 689 (W.D. Washington, 1913)
In re Kellar
192 F. 830 (First Circuit, 1912)