Home/Second Circuit/In re Wilde's Sons

In re Wilde's Sons

144 F. 972, 75 C.C.A. 601, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3924
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 1906
DocketNo. 80
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 144 F. 972 (In re Wilde's Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Wilde's Sons, 144 F. 972, 75 C.C.A. 601, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3924 (2d Cir. 1906).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the point of practice raised preliminarily to the main argument, we are clearly of the opinion that, when a District Court is reviewing an order or report of a referee in bankruptcy, under the very broad provisions of Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 2 (10), 30 Stat. 546 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3421], it may properly consider any point presented by the record then before it, whether such point was or was not discussed before or by the referee. .

We are further of the opinion that the order of the District Court should be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Alaska National Bank
669 F.2d 1325 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
In the Matter of Walsh Construction, Inc., Bankrupt. United States of America v. Alaska National Bank of the North and Paul Burlingame, Trustee, in the Matter of Cecilia Ruth Walsh, Gerald Patrick Walsh, D/B/A Beaver Builders, Bankrupts. United States of America v. Alaska National Bank of the North and Paul Burlingame, Trustee
669 F.2d 1325 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Rosehedge Corporation v. Millie Sterett
274 F.2d 786 (Ninth Circuit, 1960)
United States v. Frank Luther, Trustee of the Garden Grain & Seed Co., Inc., Frank Luther, Trustee of the Garden Grain & Seed Co., Inc., Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee. In the Matter of Garden Grain and Seed Co., Inc., Bankrupt (Two Cases)
225 F.2d 499 (Tenth Circuit, 1955)
United States v. Luther
225 F.2d 499 (Tenth Circuit, 1955)
Tinney v. Katcher
134 F.2d 833 (Sixth Circuit, 1943)
In re Elmore Cotton Mills
217 F. 810 (S.D. Alabama, 1914)
In re Quaker Drug Co.
204 F. 689 (W.D. Washington, 1913)
In re Kellar
192 F. 830 (First Circuit, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 F. 972, 75 C.C.A. 601, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wildes-sons-ca2-1906.