In re Wilbur F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Wilbur F.

42 A.D.2d 780, 346 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3701

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 30, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 42 A.D.2d 780 (In re Wilbur F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wilbur F., 42 A.D.2d 780, 346 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to adjudge appellant a juvenile delinquent, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated August 17, 1972, which granted a motion to quash subpoenas duces tecum served on the Police Department, the Police Chief, and the City Manager of the City of New Rochelle. Order reversed, in the interests of justice, without costs, and motion denied. While the order appealed from is not appealable as of right, we treat this appeal as including an application for leave to appeal and grant the application (Family Ct. Act, § 1112). We are also of the opinion that the motion to quash should not have been granted and that the items sought under the sub[781]*781poenas should be produced. Rabin, P. J., Munder, Latham, Shapiro and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to adjudge appellant a juvenile delinquent, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated August 17, 1972, which granted a motion to quash subpoenas duces tecum served on the Police Department, the Police Chief, and the City Manager of the City of New Rochelle. Order reversed, in the interests of justice, without costs, and motion denied. While the order appealed from is not appealable as of right, we treat this appeal as including an application for leave to appeal and grant the application (Family Ct. Act, § 1112). We are also of the opinion that the motion to quash should not have been granted and that the items sought under the sub[781]*781poenas should be produced. Rabin, P. J., Munder, Latham, Shapiro and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 780, 346 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wilbur-f-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack