in Re Wilbert P. Stewart
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-18-00541-CR
IN RE Wilbert P. STEWART
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 15, 2018
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Relator complains of the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc by
which he sought to correct an alleged error in flat-time credit. The Court of Criminal Appeals has
exclusive jurisdiction to grant postconviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction.
TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 § 5 (West 2015); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel.
Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig.
proceeding) (per curiam). This includes matters relating to flat-time credit. See, e.g., Ex parte
Lee, 223 S.W.3d 360, 360-61 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Because
the proper avenue for resolving the issue is by application for writ of habeas corpus as authorized
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1993-CR-0145, styled The State of Texas v. Wilbert P. Stewart, pending in the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding. 04-18-00541-CR
by article 11.07, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
Do not publish
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Wilbert P. Stewart (in Re Wilbert P. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.