In re Wiewiorka

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Wiewiorka

844 A.2d 510, 179 N.J. 225, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 171

DecidedMarch 26, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 844 A.2d 510 (In re Wiewiorka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wiewiorka, 844 A.2d 510, 179 N.J. 225, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 171 (N.J. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-239, concluding that EDWARD A. WIEW-IORKA of WEST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3(lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to submit proof of his fitness to practice law;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EDWARD A. WIEWIORKA is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent submit proof of his fitness to practice law as attested to by a mental health professional approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics within ninety days of the filing date of this Order; and it is further

[226]*226ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI