In Re Wieneke

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJanuary 13, 2012
Docket2011-1250
StatusUnpublished

This text of In Re Wieneke (In Re Wieneke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Wieneke, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE PAUL R. WIENEKE, SCOTT D. EIKENBERRY, TIM NUFIRE, DAVID A. KOBLAS, AND BRIAN K. WILSON (REAL PARTY IN INTEREST SONICWALL, INC.)

____________________

2011-1250 (Serial No. 10/449,875) ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

COLBY B. SPRINGER, Lewis and Roca LLP, of Mountain View, California, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief was TAM THANH PHAM.

JOSEPH G. PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 13, 2012 /s/Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Wieneke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wieneke-cafc-2012.