In Re Wiedemann

7 So. 3d 1162, 2009 La. LEXIS 242, 2009 WL 1099982
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 24, 2009
Docket2009-B-0674
StatusPublished

This text of 7 So. 3d 1162 (In Re Wiedemann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Wiedemann, 7 So. 3d 1162, 2009 La. LEXIS 242, 2009 WL 1099982 (La. 2009).

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent attempted to practice law in Mississippi, contrary to the regulations of that jurisdiction. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Karl Wiedemann, Louisiana Bar Roll number 18502, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall enroll in and attend one full day of Ethics School offered by the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Practice Assistance and Improvement Committee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Engolio
7 So. 3d 1162 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 So. 3d 1162, 2009 La. LEXIS 242, 2009 WL 1099982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wiedemann-la-2009.