In re Wicks

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 17, 2022
Docket22-BS-831
StatusPublished

This text of In re Wicks (In re Wicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Wicks, (D.C. 2022).

Opinion

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 22-BS-831

IN RE JENIFER WICKS, ESQUIRE, Respondent.

A Member of the Bar of the Disciplinary Docket Nos.: District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2020-D187, 2021-D124, 2021- Bar Registration Number: 465476 D125.

BEFORE: Beckwith and Easterly, Associate Judges, and Washington, Senior Judge.

ORDER (FILED—November 17, 2022)

On consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c), to suspend respondent indefinitely based on disability, the Board’s motion to file under seal, Respondent’s response thereto, and it appearing that neither Respondent nor Disciplinary Counsel had interposed any objection thereto, it is

ORDERED that Disciplinary Counsel’s motion to file under seal is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law based on disability, effective immediately, and any pending disciplinary matters be held in abeyance pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(g). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent’s attention is drawn to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 14 and 16, relating to suspended attorneys. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), with the court and the Board shall serve a copy of the affidavit on Disciplinary Counsel.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In re Wicks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wicks-dc-2022.