In re Whitfield
296 A.D.2d 871, 745 N.Y.S.2d 738, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7258
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order of disbarment entered. Memorandum: Respondent’s unexcused failure to appear or answer the petition constitutes a default (see Matter of Hopkins, 295 AD2d 1014; Matter of Hysert, 291 AD2d 937). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Whitfield, 296 A.D.2d 871, 745 N.Y.S.2d 738, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
296 A.D.2d 871 (In re Whitfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Gaesser
6 A.D.3d 1246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Cary
7 A.D.3d 24 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)