In re Whitfield
296 A.D.2d 871, 745 N.Y.S.2d 738, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7258
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 3, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 296 A.D.2d 871 (In re Whitfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Whitfield, 296 A.D.2d 871, 745 N.Y.S.2d 738, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
Order of disbarment entered. Memorandum: Respondent’s unexcused failure to appear or answer the petition constitutes a default (see Matter of Hopkins, 295 AD2d 1014; Matter of Hysert, 291 AD2d 937). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Gaesser
6 A.D.3d 1246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Cary
7 A.D.3d 24 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
296 A.D.2d 871, 745 N.Y.S.2d 738, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-whitfield-nyappdiv-2002.