In re Whitfield

Fourth Circuit

In re Whitfield

645 F. App'x 241

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 13, 2016·No. No. 16-1105·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andre D. Whitfield filed a petition for writ of .mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to issue a ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. The district court issued its final order in the § 2241 action on February 19, 2016. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andre D. Whitfield filed a petition for writ of .mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to issue a ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. The district court issued its final order in the § 2241 action on February 19, 2016. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Whitfield, 645 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

645 F. App'x 241 (In re Whitfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related