In re Whitfield
This text of 645 F. App'x 241 (In re Whitfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Andre D. Whitfield filed a petition for writ of .mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to issue a ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. The district court issued its final order in the § 2241 action on February 19, 2016. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
645 F. App'x 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-whitfield-ca4-2016.