In re Whitehead

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Whitehead

890 So. 2d 569, 2005 WL 32314

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 7, 2005

DocketNo. 2004-B-2862

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 890 So. 2d 569 (In re Whitehead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Whitehead, 890 So. 2d 569, 2005 WL 32314 (La. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected his client’s legal matter and failed to communicate with his client. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Charles R. Whitehead, III, Louisiana Bar Roll number 17862, be publicly reprimanded, subject to the conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI