In re White

103 F. 774, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162
CourtDistrict Court, D. Vermont
DecidedMay 12, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 103 F. 774 (In re White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re White, 103 F. 774, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162 (D. Vt. 1900).

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

This is a review of the dismissal of a petition of the bankrupt for a further setting apart of his homestead. The trustee is required to set apart the exemptions in the first instance, and to report the items and estimated value, but his action is not final. By section 2 of the act the courts of bankruptcy are expressly given jurisdiction to “(11) determine all claims of bankrupts to their exemptions.” The provision of rule 17 of the general orders (89 Fed. viii., 32 C. C. A. xix.), allowing 20 days for exceptions to the' setting apart, applies only to creditors, and not to [775]*775the bankrupt. Determination of claims to exemptions by the court is left without limitations, except such as the progress of the settlement of the estate, by disposition of property left, or otherwise, might impose. Nothing of this kind appears, and the petition must be retained. The just values, respectively, of the whole homestead premises, — of the part set out and of the part remaining, — are necessary to be known, for a proper determination of this claim, and these are proper subjects of special reference, which is made. Petition restored, and specially referred to referee for report of just values in the premises.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 F. 774, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-white-vtd-1900.