In Re White

712 S.E.2d 436, 393 S.C. 227, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 209
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re White. Read the opinion of the Court — 391 S.C. 581
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 22, 2011·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent was suspended on March 7, 2011, for a period of ninety (90) days. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

s/Jean H. Toal C.J. HEARN, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re White, 712 S.E.2d 436, 393 S.C. 227, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 209 (S.C. 2011).

712 S.E.2d 436 (In Re White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barber v. State
712 S.E.2d 436 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2011)