In re White
This text of 1 Barb. Ch. 43 (In re White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
said this direction in the order was wrong, and that the bond should be given either to the people, or to the register or clerk of the court with whom such bond was to be filed; that the practice in England was to take a recognizance from the committee of a lunatic or idiot and his sureties, so as to have it the more effectually under the control of the chancellor. That by the practice of this court a bond had been substituted; and that in analogy to the practice in England, the proper course was to make the bond payable to the people of the state, or to the officer of the court in whose office it was to be filed.
Order accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Barb. Ch. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-white-nychanct-1845.