In re Whipple

81 A.D. 589, 81 N.Y.S. 393
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 81 A.D. 589 (In re Whipple) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Whipple, 81 A.D. 589, 81 N.Y.S. 393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

Patterson, J.;

The only matter necessary to be considered on this appeal relates to the allowance by the surrogate, on the settlement of the accounts [590]*590of the executors, of commissions to such executors. Addison 0. Rand, by his last will and testament, appointed G-eorge E.- Whipple, Hugh Y. Conrad and Jasper R. Rand the executors of such will. Letters were issued to the three executors on April 24,1900. Jasper R. Rand died July 18, 1900. In the settlement, of the executors* account the surrogate has allowed commissions upon moneys.received and paid out by the surviving executors, in accordance with the rates authorized by section 2730 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The account is a final one, and the commissions allowed to the two surviving executors are awarded in strict accordance with the statute, except that there is a slight error in calculating the amount to which they were entitled. Each of the surviving executors is allowed by the surrogate’s. decree the sum of $5,421.92. A close calculation "would show that they were each entitled to $5,412.92. Each of them, therefore, has been allowed nine dollars too much. There is another error in calculating the amount of commissions to which the surviving executors were entitled, and that is, the allowance of commissions on the specific gift of shares of stock to one of the legatees. These commissions are twenty dollars to each of the surviving executors, and that, amount should be deducted. The surrogate was right in allowing to the éxecutrix of the deceased executor Jasper R. Rand commissions only upon such sums as were received and paid out during the lifetime of Jasper R. Rand. The provision of the statute would not allow of compensation to be made upon the basis of the inventory of the estate, but only for actual service in receiving and disbursing the moneys of the estate.

The decree should be modified by reducing the amounts allowed to the surviving executors as above indicated, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs in this court. ■

Yan Brunt, P. J., O’Brien, Ingraham and Hatch, JJ., concurred.

Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Volckening
75 Misc. 2d 221 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1973)
In re the Estate of McGrath
74 Misc. 2d 92 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1973)
In re the Accounting of Terry
208 Misc. 197 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1955)
In re Clemens
198 Misc. 778 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1950)
In re the Estate of Wing
184 Misc. 379 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1944)
In re the Estate of Dunigan
177 Misc. 212 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1941)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of Irving Trust Co.
261 A.D. 120 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
In re the Estate of Griffith
151 Misc. 697 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1934)
In re the Estate of Hurley
149 Misc. 68 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)
In re the Estate of Newton
148 Misc. 510 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)
In re the Estate of Anable
139 Misc. 914 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1931)
In re the Estate of Rosenberg
124 Misc. 434 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1924)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings Evans
104 Misc. 641 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1918)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of Lester
172 A.D. 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of Lester
17 Mills Surr. 120 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1916)
In re the Estate of Mart E.
5 Mills Surr. 197 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1906)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of McCormick
4 Mills Surr. 507 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 A.D. 589, 81 N.Y.S. 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-whipple-nyappdiv-1903.