In re Wheeler

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Wheeler

406 S.E.2d 336, 305 S.C. 84, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 130

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 12, 1991·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent is an attorney licensed to practice law in South Carolina and petitions this Court to be transferred to disability inactive status pursuant to Paragraph 19 of Rule 413, SCACR.

The petition is granted and respondent is transferred to disability inactive status until further order of this Court. C. Steven Moskos, Esquire, is appointed pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent and his clients.

This order, when served on any bank maintaining a trust and/or escrow account of respondent, will serve as notice to the bank that C. Steven Moskos has been duly appointed by this Court.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Respondent is an attorney licensed to practice law in South Carolina and petitions this Court to be transferred to disability inactive status pursuant to Paragraph 19 of Rule 413, SCACR.

The petition is granted and respondent is transferred to disability inactive status until further order of this Court. C. Steven Moskos, Esquire, is appointed pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent and his clients.

This order, when served on any bank maintaining a trust and/or escrow account of respondent, will serve as notice to the bank that C. Steven Moskos has been duly appointed by this Court.

It is so ordered.

In re Wheeler, 406 S.E.2d 336, 305 S.C. 84, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 130 (S.C. 1991).

Pincite

406 S.E.2d 336 (In re Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.