In re Wheeler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Wheeler

830 A.2d 950

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 29, 2003·No. No. 322 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Rec[951]*951ommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated May 2, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Rec[951]*951ommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated May 2, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

In re Wheeler, 830 A.2d 950 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

830 A.2d 950 (In re Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.