In re Wheeler

820 N.E.2d 1265, 2005 Ind. LEXIS 54, 2005 WL 156690
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 21, 2005
DocketNo. 49S00-0411-DI-487
StatusPublished

This text of 820 N.E.2d 1265 (In re Wheeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Wheeler, 820 N.E.2d 1265, 2005 Ind. LEXIS 54, 2005 WL 156690 (Ind. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER SUSPENDING RESPONDENT FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW IN INDIANA

On November 24, 2004, this Court ordered the respondent, Kimberly Ann Wheeler, to show cause why she should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to her failure to respond to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission's demands for a response to a grievance filed against her. The order required that the respondent show cause in writing within 10 days of service of the order. The Commission has also moved this Court to impose costs against the respondent, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10)(F)(5), in the amount of $513.26..

The Court finds that the respondent has not submitted a response to the Order to Show Cause dated November 24, 2004. Accordingly, the Court finds that the respondent should be suspended immediately from the practice of law in Indiana pursuant to Admis.Dise.R. 23(10)(f), and costs assessed against the respondent in the amount of $513.26.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the respondent, Kimberly Ann Wheeler, is hereby suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately. Pursuant to Ad-mis.Dise.R. 28(10)(f(4), the suspension shall continue until: 1) the Executive Secretary of the Disciplinary Commission certifies to the Court that she has cooperated with the investigation; 2) the investigation or any related disciplinary proceedings that may arise from the investigation is disposed; or 3) until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondent, pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 23(10)(D(5), is to reimburse the Disciplinary Commission $513.26 for the costs of prosecuting this proceeding.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this order to the respondent by certified mail, return receipt requested, at her address as reflected in the Roll of Attorneys. The Clerk of this Court is further directed to issue notice of this order to the Disciplinary Commission.

The Clerk of this Court is further directed to give notice of this action pursuant to Admis.Dise.R. 28(8)(d) and to provide to the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Cireuit and the clerks of each of the United States District Courts and United States Bankruptcy Courts in this state, the respondent's last known address as reflected in the records of the Clerk of this Court.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
820 N.E.2d 1265, 2005 Ind. LEXIS 54, 2005 WL 156690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wheeler-ind-2005.